Menard Secures Stay in Signify Patent Litigation

Menard Secures Stay

Menard Secures Stay in Patent Litigation, Potentially Easing Legal Complexities

A significant development has occurred in the patent litigation case (3:22-cv-00706-jdp) at the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. The court has granted a stay in the proceedings involving Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V. against Menard, Inc. This decision follows Menard’s request for a stay while the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) conducts an inter partes review (IPR) on one of the disputed patents. For more details, refer to the EdisonReport coverage from 18 September.

Background of the Case

Signify has accused Menard, Inc. of selling lighting products infringing on six LED-related patents. In response, Menard filed third-party complaints against several manufacturers of the alleged infringing products. This significantly expands the scope of the litigation and increases its complexity.

The case has generated extensive documentation, with summary judgment filings exceeding 2,000 pages.  Due to the size and complexity of these filings, the court described the case as “extraordinarily ponderous,” even for patent litigation.

In its request from 18 September, Menard argued that the IPR’s outcome could simplify the trial process. If the PTAB finds the claims of the ’336 patent invalid, a significant portion of the litigation could be resolved without a trial.

Court’s Rationale for the Stay

The court granted the stay to streamline the case. It was acknowledged that considerable work would remain after the review. However, resolving the IPR could clarify key issues related to the ’336 patent, which is critical to the case.

Implications for the Parties Involved

As a result of the stay, all pending motions—three motions for summary judgment and two to strike—have been denied without prejudice. Therefore, the parties can refile their motions after the inter partes review concludes. This decision aims to prevent redundancy and avoid unnecessary complexity as the case progresses.

Next Steps

The stay’s granting highlights the significance of the ongoing inter-partes review process. Depending on the outcomes, this process may reshape the litigation landscape. Once the review concludes, the court will provide further instructions and limitations for any motions the parties may choose to refile.

Signify_North_America_Corporation_v_Menard_Inc__wiwdce-22-00706__0352.0-3