Signify and Keystone Technologies Head Toward Settlement Discussions in Patent Dispute
The legal battle between Signify Holding B.V. and Keystone Technologies, LLC is moving forward, with the court setting key deadlines and an opportunity for settlement discussions. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which handles the case, aims to encourage both parties to engage in meaningful negotiations while proceeding with discovery. The lawsuit, filed under Civil Action No. 24cv6761, involves allegations of patent infringement related to lighting technology.
Settlement Conference Plans
The court has referred the case to Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski for a settlement conference. However, both parties must confirm their willingness to negotiate in good faith before the conference can take place. To move forward, they must demonstrate that they are in a strong position to reach an agreement. The court also expects them to thoroughly prepare and follow Judge Sitarski’s guidelines to ensure a productive discussion.
Important Deadlines and Upcoming Events
An Initial Pretrial Conference is scheduled for February 11, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., before Judge Chad F. Kenney in Courtroom 11B at the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse. Leading up to this conference, several deadlines have been established to keep the case on track.
- 4 February 2025: Both parties must exchange initial disclosures as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) requires.
- 6 February 2025: Plaintiff’s counsel must submit the Rule 26(f) Meeting Report by 12:00 p.m. after consulting with all involved parties.
- Ongoing: The discovery process has already started, and the parties must serve initial interrogatories and document requests within ten days of the court’s order.
Impact
This case has the potential to influence our industry significantly. Since both Signify and Keystone hold major market positions, the outcome could shape future patent strategies and competition within the LED and lighting control sectors. Many lighting companies are closely following the proceedings to understand how the ruling might affect product development and sales strategies.
What Lies Ahead?
As the case progresses, both sides must balance legal strategy with the potential for settlement. Whether they can find common ground or the case moves to trial remains to be seen. Meantime, the court’s structured timeline ensures continued progress and encourages cooperation between the parties. The schedule for going forward adds pressure on Keystone because it will now start becoming even more expensive.
Stay updated with EdisonReport on the latest developments in this case.
Read the court order here.
